Home » Latest » Basketball » Dwyane Wade obviously had a better career than Paul Pierce – Stephen A. | First Take

Dwyane Wade obviously had a better career than Paul Pierce – Stephen A. | First Take

4

InfoSearched 9 0 Basketball

SaveSavedRemoved 0

Debate!!

Stephen A. Smith and Max Kellerman give their takes on Paul Pierce declaring he had a better NBA career than Dwyane Wade. While Max says this discussion is certainly debatable, Stephen A. begs to differ and claims Pierce’s career “doesn’t compare” to Wade’s.

How did Wade’s ability to play alongside other elite players impact his career?

Dwyane Wade and Paul Pierce are two of the most well-regarded basketball players of their generation. With their incredible skills and impressive accomplishments, it is no wonder that comparisons between the two are often made. Recently, on the popular sports show “First Take”, host Stephen A. Smith declared that Wade had clearly had a better career than Pierce. In this article, we will explore the reasons behind Smith’s bold statement and examine the evidence that supports it.

To begin, let’s take a look at the accomplishments of both players. Wade, a shooting guard, played for the Miami Heat, the Chicago Bulls, and the Cleveland Cavaliers during his illustrious career. In his 16 years in the league, Wade amassed an impressive list of accolades, including three NBA championships, 13 NBA All-Star Game appearances, and an NBA Finals MVP award. He also holds the record for most blocked shots by a guard in NBA history.

Pierce, on the other hand, played primarily for the Boston Celtics, as well as the Brooklyn Nets, Washington Wizards, and Los Angeles Clippers. During his 19-year career, Pierce earned 10 NBA All-Star Game selections, an NBA championship, and an NBA Finals MVP award. He also ranks 15th on the NBA’s all-time scoring list.

While both players have impressive resumes, Smith argues that Wade’s accomplishments give him the edge. “There is no comparison when you think about Dwyane Wade and his career vs. Paul Pierce,” Smith said on “First Take”. “Dwyane Wade is a three-time NBA champion, a Finals MVP, he’s one of the top two guards in NBA history with Michael Jordan… he’s done everything.”

Smith’s assertion that Wade is one of the top two guards in NBA history may be subjective, but it is tough to argue with his other points. The three NBA championships and NBA Finals MVP award set Wade apart from Pierce, indicating that he was a key contributor to successful teams. Furthermore, Wade’s all-time versatility as a guard is evidenced by his impressive blocking record.

Another factor that may give Wade an advantage over Pierce is his ability to play alongside other elite players. During his tenure with the Heat, Wade played alongside LeBron James and Chris Bosh, forming one of the most dominant trios in NBA history. Pierce, while he certainly played with talented teammates during his career, never had the same level of superstar support as Wade.

In conclusion, while opinions on this topic may vary, there is convincing evidence to support Stephen A. Smith’s claim that Dwyane Wade had a better career than Paul Pierce. Wade’s impressive list of accomplishments, versatility as a guard, and ability to play alongside other elite players set him apart from Pierce. Regardless of where one stands in this debate, it is clear that both Wade and Pierce are two of the greatest basketball players of all time, and their legacies will continue to be celebrated for years to come.